The Pentagon’s UAP Task Force with Franc Milburn – We’re joined by Franc Milburn, former intelligence officer, strategic risk analyst, and author of “The Pentagon’s UAP Task Force”, to discuss the US Government’s AATIP and UAPTF investigations and the potential risk & threat posed by Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP).

Original Report:

What makes the Navy UAP sightings so important?

What makes the Navy UAP sightings since 2004 so important is the level of verifiable data, from the range of sensors, platforms, outstanding credibility, professional and tech expertise of the witnesses, the videos, open source scientific analysis, like that from the SCU for UAP studies.

How does older UFO data apply to the current study?

It’s important not to let post-2004 modern UFO period dominate as there are plenty of compelling cases from the past 70 years with outstanding witnesses and sometimes documentation to back them up – Tehran 1976 case.

Where are they from?

Eric Davis uses “off-world”, but the DoD has said unidentified… he was in his own words a DoD advisor, so people can draw their own conclusions. Look back to his NIDs days and John Alexanders´s and others´ comments, there are a range of possibilities as I outlined in the paper. Time traveler, inter-dimensional, ET, PSP… April 2019 interview, Dr. Davis says: “We do know one thing. We know they´re there. We don´t know their origin because they don´t want to communicate that to us.”

Are they a threat?

Threat = Capability + Intent. People say they are not a threat, they are a threat, they want to help us, they want to infiltrate us (David Jacobs). Who are they? Without knowing that you can´t assign intent. Russians, Chi-com, North Korea, Iran.. you can assign intentions based on observation as well as stated intentions.

Are the UAP documented behaviors dangerous?

Jamming, dangerous intercepts, operationally affecting nukes would all be considered hostile, aggressive / unsafe if done by neer-peer adversaries, acts and we see jamming / painting with targeting radars and aggressive intercepts fairly regularly. The intelligences behind UAP, as you have already pointed out – would know that humans are highly territorial and anyone monitoring us would know that there are locations and periods of extremely high flash-point tensions around the world. 1976. Tehran case Jamming. DIA interest, Cdr David Fravor reported jamming.

Are they testing our capabilities?

Eric Davis has said it has all been just hide and seek, hide and seek, and we’ll use stealth as far as possible so that humans don’t see us in the environment and then when we expose ourselves, we expose ourselves, do our little fun games and then take off. They may be testing our technology. They may be testing the US Navy´s capabilities when they do this and they have also done this with the Air Force too. What are they doing it for? They are not humans so they don´t think like humans. In case they decide to become aggressive, we´re screwed.

About Our Guest:

Franc Milburn is a strategic and operational advisor. A former intelligence officer, he is an alumnus of Sandhurst and the London School of Economics. He has previously written for the Middle East Economic Survey, the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, and the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University

You may also like...